THE INTERNET OF BIO-NANOTHINGS

The Internet of Things (IoT) vs. Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT)

The properties of recently studied nanomaterials, such as graphene, have inspired the concept of Internet of NanoThings (IoNT), based on the interconnection of nanoscale devices. Despite being an enabler for many applications, the artificial nature of IoNT devices can be detrimental where the deployment of NanoThings could result in unwanted effects on health or pollution. The novel paradigm of the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT) is introduced in this paper by stemming from synthetic biology and nanotechnology tools that allow the engineering of biological embedded computing devices. Based on biological cells, and their functionalities in the biochemical domain, Bio-NanoThings promise to enable applications such as intra-body sensing and actuation networks, and environmental control of toxic agents and pollution. The IoBNT stands as a paradigm-shifting concept for communication and network engineering, where novel challenges are faced to develop efficient and safe techniques for the exchange of information, interaction, and networking within the biochemical domain, while enabling an interface to the electrical domain of the Internet.

IoT defines a cyberphysical paradigm, where all types of real-world physical elements (sensors, actuators, personal electronic devices, or home appliances, among others) are connected, and are able to autonomously interact with each other. This new form of seamless connectivity is the enabler for many applications such as machine to machine communication, real time monitoring of industrial processes, smart cities, smart grids for energy management, intelligent transportation, environmental monitoring, infrastructure management, medical and healthcare systems, building and home automation, and large scale deployments. www./threadreaderapp.com

This is very concerning regarding the shots .
What they have done is pure evil . pic.twitter.com/Nlaw5RFEXe

— karma (@karma44921039) May 2, 2024

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi

“The success of the clinical approval study is a story for itself of a large-scale fraud and deception…This was the first prank, but the second followed immediately, the biggest scam of all time. Remember, a few billion artificially created DNA recipes to vaccinate only 20,000 people was feasible in the genetic laboratory. But to vaccinate billions of people, no, that wasn’t possible. It was simply too much and far too expensive to make the vaccines. To do this, manufacturers had to go back to nature. The trick, the billions and trillions of countless DNA recipes are no longer put together under computer control in machines, they came from bacteria. So two ways to production. First way artificial, computer controlled. Second way, mass production by bacteria, mini-chromosomes, plasmids. These mini-chromosomes, in this case this DNA is no longer human DNA, but that is now bacterial DNA, mind you. These mini chromosomes are easy to obtain and manipulate. Foreign recipes, for example, the gene for the corona spike protein or any other gene you want, can be inserted there. The bacteria are then cultivated and simply automatically multiplied en masse through cultivation. The plasmids are then extracted and used as a template for producing the mRNA copies…This is different from the officially approved procedure. Has the use of bacterial chromosomes for vaccine production ever been reported? Tested and approved for safety?…Answer, no, they have never been tested, neither for content nor for security. The regulatory authorities, including PEI, EMA and FDA, simply waved them through and approved them. They, the authorities, were accomplices and accomplices.”

Shocking…
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: “The success of the clinical approval study is a story for itself of a large-scale fraud and deception…This was the first prank, but the second followed immediately, the biggest scam of all time. Remember, a few billion artificially created DNA…

— Camus (@newstart_2024)